![]() “They love the idea that there’s a smoking gun in the FBI files-‘See, look, Bigfoot must be real, otherwise the FBI wouldn’t have taken it seriously,’” he continues. “There’s nothing wrong with that, but it shouldn’t be mistaken for de facto government endorsement of the reality of Bigfoot.”Įven so, Bigfoot believers may be tempted to spin it that way. “All it means is the FBI did a favor to a Bigfoot researcher,” Radford says. ![]() military’s decades-long investigation of unexplained aerial phenomena, popularly known as UFOs, is an endorsement of the existence of aliens. To be clear, this is not evidence that the FBI endorsed the existence of Bigfoot, any more than the U.S. ![]() In early 1977, he sent the hair back to Byrne along with his scientific conclusion: “The hairs are of deer family origin.” Four decades later, the bureau declassified its “Bigfoot file” about this analysis. Unsurprisingly, Cochran found that the hair didn’t belong to Bigfoot. Still, it sometimes made exceptions “in the interest of research and scientific inquiry,” and Cochran said he’d make such an exception for Byrne. Jay Cochran, Jr., assistant director of the FBI’s scientific and technical services division, wrote back to Byrne that he couldn’t find any evidence of the FBI analyzing suspected Bigfoot hair, and that the FBI usually only examined physical evidence related to criminal investigations. The FBI Offers No Confirmation of Bigfoot's Existence Byrne has always believed the footage is real. Many people believe the “Bigfoot” creature in the Patterson-Gimlin film was a costumed prankster as well. It’s worth noting that the original “evidence” that launched the Bigfoot craze-a trail of oversized footprints discovered in the same region in 1958-was revealed to be a prank by logger Ray L. This was also after Roger Patterson and Robert Gimlin released their famous video footage in 1967 supposedly showing Bigfoot in Northern California. ![]() That was when The Six Million Dollar Man had a cameo by Bigfoot.” But in the 1970s, Bigfoot was really, really popular. “In 2019, a lot of people think of Bigfoot as being sort of silly and a joke, or whatever else. He also wanted to know if the FBI had analyzed suspected Bigfoot hair before and if so, what the bureau’s conclusion was.Īt the time, “Byrne was one of the more prominent Bigfoot researchers,” says Benjamin Radford, deputy editor of Skeptical Inquirer magazine. That year, Director Peter Byrne of the Bigfoot Information Center and Exhibition in The Dalles, Oregon, sent the FBI “about 15 hairs attached to a tiny piece of skin.” Byrne wrote that his organization couldn’t identify what kind of animal it came from, and was hoping the FBI might analyze it. Hair samples sent into the FBI for testing, believed to be from Bigfoot. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |